When we argue in English composition classes, or in civic debate, we are not necessarily screaming and yelling as the common definition of the word might imply. An argument is a set of statements meant to prove or persuade through the use of logic. An argument contains one or more premises and a conclusion. The standard form of an argument is demonstrated by the classic example shown below:

Premise: Bill is a cat.

Premise: All cats are animals.

Conclusion: Bill is an animal.

This simple argument is known as a deductive syllogism. Some models of the standard form of an argument make use of a major and minor premise; the logical process, however, is exactly the same. How could the argument above be attacked? One, you could demonstrate that Bill is actually a dog, invalidating the first premise and undermining the argument. Or you could prove that cats are really an alien species and invalidate the second premise. These are both examples of challenging the premises. Alternately, if the argument read “Bill is a cat. All fish are animals. Bill is an animal,” you could highlight the flaw in the argument’s logic. So, the two ways to attack and argument are 1) to refute one of its premises and 2) to demonstrate that its logical structure is faulty.

Some arguments have unstated premises, known as assumptions. Look at the argument below. What is its unstated premise?

Premise: Juan is 6 feet tall and in 10th grade.

Premise: ???

Conclusion: Juan would make a good basketball player.

The unstated premise or assumption here is that tall children necessarily make good basketball players. But being tall isn’t enough to guarantee that someone will be good at basketball. Juan might not be very coordinated or he might not have any interest in sports. In either case, Juan would then not make a very good basketball player even though he is tall.

Fallacious Arguments

Fallacious arguments may sound convincing, but after closer scrutiny, turn out to be unsound. A fallacious argument may be built upon a questionable premise or use twisted logic. Fallacious arguments appear quite often in advertising, public debate, and even interpersonal communication. Detailed below are some well known types of fallacious arguments.

Appeal to Emotion – An argument that depends on fear, pity, or other feelings is an appeal to emotion. Example: “If voters don’t approve this proposition, we will have an economic catastrophe!”

Circular Reasoning – This type or argument merely restates its premise. Example: “Rock and roll is the best music because it rocks and it rolls!”

Hasty Generalization – An argument that attributes a particular varying characteristic to all members of a class is called a hasty generalization. Racial, religious, and gender prejudices are particularly harmful forms of hasty generalizations. Example: “I don’t want Stella to have a part in the play. She’s a Leo and they grab all the attention.” 

False Authority – An argument that claims unwarranted expertise or that transfers expertise in one field to another. Celebrity appeal can be considered to be a form of false authority. Example: “Peter Brick, who played a doctor for years on Suburban Clinic, recommends Stopicet for all serious cuts and bruises.” 

False Causality (Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc) – The Latin name for this fallacious argument, post hoc, ergo propter hoc, means “after this therefore because of this.” Example: “In the week after I left ABC, Inc., its stock dropped dramatically. I must have been really important to the company.”

False Dilemma (Either/Or Argument) – An argument that presents only two options when there are a number of viable solutions. Example: “America. Love it or leave it!”

Personal Attack (Ad Hominem) – This fallacious argument’s Latin name, ad hominem, means “against the man,” and that’s what it does–it attacks the speaker’s personal qualities rather than the argument he or she is putting forth. Example: “We should definitely not approve the mayor’s budget. He’s often quite late returning his rented movies.”   

Slippery Slope – This type of argument takes a minor action or event and escalates it to catastrophic proportions. Example: “If we prohibit assault rifles, then pretty soon the government will take away every gun, knife, and blunt object in our houses.”


4 responses to “Argument

  1. Noah Shepherd

    I find that a lot of this has to do with speech-writing and persuasive essay work. Its a very interesting and informative read. Reading about the uses of logic in arguments is the key to the lock in understanding how to compose a persuasive essay, or even to be a decent politician (that’s debatable).

    After reading this article, I referred back to certain political debates I have seen on TV in my head. Its very interesting to be able to connect certain arguments with this article. There was a lot of appealing to the emotion in the 2008 elections, and alot of personal attacks as well.

    I find and agree that Ad Hominem arguments really aren’t effective in the political scene because instead of addressing the issue or opposing viewpoint, they often times nitpick at the other politician, which does nothing to resolve any issues. However, the basic use of logic towards the top of the article seems to be one of the better ways to tackle things politically.

  2. Michelle Pedrigal

    Screaming or yelling is not, indeed, needed for arguments. Arguments would be much better with less yelling because they may not necessarily be driven by anger. How can a person even think reasonably logical if his or her mind is clouded by a strong emotion that can sometimes get out of control?

    Other than that, all this time I have been threatened by my parents about my future. “Choose a job now or be unsuccessful.” Without this class, I would never even double-think that this statement of theirs is a type of fallacious argument. I feel even more dense than before since I have been worried and scared about being unsuccessful, as they say, all my teenage life. I still worry a little, but not as much as I did before. I stressing over a belief that my parents led me to believe.

  3. Jaqueline Aleman

    I found this article very intriguing. I love arguing with people and use these different aspects in all of my arguments. The fallacious arguments caught my attention as well. I am currently undecided for my major and i am strongly considering advertising now.

    I found that I understand argument better because it is so logical. I am a very logical person, and in previous experience and debates, I most often use logic (logos).

  4. Personally, I find being aware of these fallacies extremely helpful not only in constructing my own logical argument, but also in developing a sound counter argument. Most of us see any one of these examples throughout our daily life, but the important part is knowing what we are actually encountering. Like the above excerpt stated, we are most likely to see this in advertising (my favorite example in class was Eric Estrada claiming that swamp land in Arkansas is a good investment). Another common scene played over and over again is the professional athlete demonstrating how fast they are because of the new nike sneaker. The examples are endless, which is why I feel more comfortable in knowing which arguments are truly sound and which are faulty.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s